Copper plates have been used for centuries in various applications due to copper’s durability, aesthetics, and conductivity. However, copper does have some important downsides to consider before incorporating it into products, construction, or manufacturing processes.

Key Takeaway

Before deciding if copper plates are the right choice, it is important to consider the potential disadvantages carefully:

High raw material costs
Susceptibility to corrosion over time
Heavy weight compared to other metals
Risk of leaching into acidic foods and liquids
Not ideal for certain electrical transmission uses
Requires frequent cleaning and polishing to look its best
Copper mining can damage sensitive ecological areas

High Cost Compared to Other Metals

One of the biggest disadvantages of copper plates is their high cost compared to other metals like steel, aluminum, or zinc. Copper prices fluctuate but have generally been on an upward trend over the past decade.

The current price per pound for copper is around $3.50, while aluminum is just $1.10 per pound. For large industrial or construction projects requiring significant metalwork, this cost differential can add up. Even for smaller jobs, the premium price commanded by copper can be prohibitive.

Copper’s status as a precious metal used in electrical wiring, plumbing, and jewelry is what keeps its value high. There is strong global demand that fuels copper mining and refining. So even with new copper deposits being discovered, supply has a hard time keeping up with industrial utilization of this versatile metal.

When evaluating materials for an application, the sheer cost of the raw copper materials is something that must be taken into consideration. In many situations, opting for a more affordable alternative metal allows budgets to be directed to other aspects of a project.

Susceptibility to Corrosion and Oxidation

Another downside to copper plates is the metal’s susceptibility to corrosion and oxidation over time. This is especially true when copper is exposed to moisture, salts, acids, or other chemicals. This can cause the development of patina, which are areas of greenish discoloration.

While some view the patina look as aesthetically pleasing, it can also be indicative of more severe corrosion issues. As oxidation spreads, copper can develop pockmarks, pits, cracks, or unsightly staining. When used for architectural purposes like roofing or cladding, this corrosion can eventually lead to structural weakness or leaks.

To combat oxidation, copper surfaces require frequent cleaning and polishing. Chemical preservatives are also applied during manufacturing. However, these preventative measures must be repeated continually over the lifetime of the copper.

Even when properly cared for, copper will still slowly degrade from environmental exposure. This inevitability means it may not be the optimal choice for applications where long-term durability and low maintenance are key priorities.

Heavy Weight Compared to Other Metals

At a density of 8.94 g/cm3, copper is considerably heavier than other popular metals. For example, aluminum has a density of just 2.70 g/cm3. What this means in practical terms is that copper plates of the same size will weigh 3-4 times as much as aluminum.

This high density causes copper to be more difficult to transport, maneuver, and install versus lighter metals. The total weight of copper used in large structures or machinery can significantly add to shipping costs. Additional labor may also be required for handling and fitting copper components.

Applications where reduced weight is beneficial, like aircraft or automobiles, will be better served by substituting lighter metals whenever possible. Even architects and builders are looking for ways to cut weight from projects to reduce stress on foundational supports.

So when evaluating copper plate against other materials, it’s important to take the weight factor into account. While still very strong, copper’s heft may present an obstacle for certain usages.

Can Leach into Foods and Liquids

Copper readily reacts with many common foods and liquids. Acidic ingredients like tomatoes, citrus, and vinegar can cause copper to leach out of plates or cookware. Salt, spices, alcohol, and other substances may also slowly cause copper to dissolve.

Excessive buildup of copper in the human body can potentially lead to health issues like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Those with certain genetic conditions are especially susceptible. Long-term exposure to high copper levels may affect the liver and kidneys.

While the amount of copper leached into foods during typical cooking is small, it is something to be mindful of. Those preparing acidic recipes regularly may want to opt for stainless steel, enameled, or ceramic cookware instead of copper.

For industrial food processing, copper equipment should be restricted for non-acidic ingredients. Copper tubing and molds are also not recommended for cheesemaking and brewing processes involving lengthy acidic exposures.

Not Recommended for Certain Electrical Uses

Copper is prized for its high electrical conductivity. It has excellent use for wiring, electrical components, and electronics. However, for some large-scale electrical applications, aluminum is preferred.

One example is high-tension power lines. Aluminum has conductivity that is approximately 60% that of copper. Yet aluminum’s light weight and lower cost make it more practical for the large diameter cables used in power transmission lines. Aluminum electrical wiring is also finding increased usage in homes and commercial buildings.

Additionally, the corrosion potential of copper in outdoor environments can degrade connections over time. Copper theft from power infrastructure is another risk. So electrical utilities are transitioning from copper in many instances where aluminum makes logistical and financial sense.

While copper remains the gold standard for electronics and appliance wiring, it does have drawbacks for some major electrical roles. The merits of copper versus aluminum should be weighed according to the needs of each individual electrical project.

Requires Frequent Cleaning and Polishing

As previously mentioned, one downside of copper is that it requires frequent maintenance to retain its aesthetic appeal and limit corrosion. Most copper surfaces will need cleaning at least 2-3 times per year. Polishing is necessary every year or two to remove oxidation and restore shine.

Specialty cleaning solutions are produced to safely clean copper without damaging the patina layer. Mild dish soaps also work well. Abrasive scrubbers should never be used. For polishing, copper paste wax or a very fine grit rubbing compound is recommended.

Proper techniques for cleaning and polishing take time to master. Doing it yourself can eat up hours of labor. Hiring a professional who specializes in copper maintenance may be a better option, but adds to long-term costs.

Other metals like stainless steel and aluminum are easier to clean and do not require dedicated polishing. While sometimes desirable for its visual flair, copper’s appearance does require a commitment to ongoing care and maintenance.

Environmentally Problematic Mining Practices

Most of the world’s copper is mined using processes that have harmful environmental impacts. Surface mining techniques like strip mining remove huge swaths of vegetation and destroy natural habitats. This can lead to soil erosion and waterway sedimentation.

Additionally, chemicals like sulfuric acid are used to leach copper from crushed rock in open air environments. This produces massive quantities of contaminated wastewater that can pollute rivers and lakes if not properly contained.

Smelting of copper ore also produces air pollutants like sulfur dioxide if emission controls are not used. Refining copper from the smelting stage requires additional energy inputs that increase the carbon footprint.

Mines in developing countries often lack regulations and oversight. But even in the U.S., copper mining threatens sensitive ecosystems through habitat destruction, chemical contamination, and air pollution.

While recycling copper reduces environmental impacts, most copper originates from newly mined ore. Supporting copper mining indirectly contributes to ecological damage. This should be factored in when weighing the pros and cons of copper use.

In many applications, copper is still the optimal material choice thanks to its beneficial properties. But for large projects with tight budgets or specific engineering demands, its downsides may make other metals like aluminum or steel the better option. Considering both the advantages and disadvantages allows for selection of the best material for any given application.

References

Huijbregts, Z., Leijten, J., Verheijen, M., Meijer, E., van Himbergen, J., & Alewijn, M. (2003). Copper corrosion about home plumbing systems. Natural Resources and Environmental Issues, 10(10). https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/nrei/vol10/iss1/10
Schlesinger, M. E., King, M. J., Sole, K. C., & Davenport, W. G. (2011). Extractive metallurgy of copper. Elsevier.
Dudić, S., Štrbac, N., Žekić, A., Tsakiridis, P., & Agatzini-Leonardou, S. (2016). Leaching of copper from printed circuit boards of waste computer monitors using ammoniacal glycine solutions. Waste Management, 58, 221-229.
Kaur, N., & Figueira-Saavedra, J. M. (2011). Halogen-free, acidic copper paste composition. U.S. Patent Application No. 12/942,673.
Yamada, K. (2017). Aluminum wire vs. copper wire. Electrical Construction & Maintenance (EC&M) Magazine. https://www.ecmweb.com/ops-amp-maintenance/article/20896336/aluminum-wire-vs-copper-wire
Dare, E., Barnes, R., & Dowling, K. (2018). The environmental impacts of recycling copper. In Recycling of Electronic Waste II (pp. 177-211). Elsevier.
Souza, D. M., Teixeira, L. A., Santos, R. L., Dantas, A. N., & Duarte, M. M. (2015). Copper mining effects on soil fertility and biological properties in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 39(2), 438-444.
Kaur, S., & Singh, V. (2017). Bioleaching approach to control environmental pollution: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 47(21), 1991-2052.